Every following request to the automounter then fails. How do I make an alien technology feel alien? I'll post a PR once there's an util-linux 2.27.1 (and update my PPA for semaphore). karelzak commented Nov 2, 2015 util-linux v2.27.1 released systemd member zonque commented Nov 2, 2015 Cool, thanks a lot. this contact form
Honestly, for that lxcfs issue I think I don't feel too bad to have broken that... ;-) Certainly not for that -- in the distro we must fix such silly bugs. martinpitt self-assigned this Oct 13, 2015 stinky1 commented Oct 16, 2015 FYI: This morning I did a fresh install of Debian on a lenovo T410 laptop and ran into this exact Subscribing... But e.
You should get ... My question now is how to make automounter behave correctly in the case of mount.nfs processes failing to remove the mtab~ lock file to allow all my hosts mount each other? I tried to do a fsck.jfs : No luck.
Maybe file a bug against gibc to change the _PATH_MOUNTED define? Originally was 227-2 and 215-17+deb8u2 respectively. IlyaSukhanov commented Oct 16, 2015 Filed a downstream bug report with debian. Join Date Aug 2008 BeansHidden!
If distros still don't get this right then there's a good chunk of blame to put on them really... systemd member poettering commented Oct 9, 2015 Anyway, happy to drop the whole mtab crap, but we should sync that up with util-linux, and add a versioned dep on that release. Maybe it could be useful if you edited it with your partitions. martinpitt added a commit to martinpitt/systemd that referenced this issue Nov 2, 2015 martinpitt Not much user-friendly...). EDIT: I've fixed the problem by creating the symlink with boot-repair-disk. You signed in with another tab or window.
Safety - Improve braking power in wet conditions Build me a brick wall! weblink So this was good for something :-) We won't ship the next Debian release with this strict check, but having it for a couple of weeks seems useful indeed to discover Notices Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community. Bug?
Adv Reply October 14th, 2008 #10 bangmalley View Profile View Forum Posts Just Give Me the Beans! By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. navigate here Later on, tmpfiles.d/etc.conf will fix /etc/mtab anyway, so there's not even a point in warning about it.
I deleted the mtab.fuselock, same thing. Rants apart, an hint to recover broken systems for those using Grub and stumble upon this bug report: at the boot menu, modify the boot entry on linux command line adding Adv Reply October 13th, 2008 #6 ajgreeny View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Xubuntu from dawn to dusk and beyond Join Date Jul 2005 Location England BeansHidden!
Offline #3 2010-04-11 12:25:24 tpfkanep Member From: South Africa Registered: 2009-12-15 Posts: 64 Re: [SOLVED] Mounting local filesystems [Busy] Yes (a pacman -Qs jfs confirms this). You can easily check this with cat /etc/fstab hardlinks cannot be created between different partitions, only symlinks can. Edit: I try to update to Intrepid, updating... What is the meaning of ''cry oneself"?
Personal Open source Business Explore Sign up Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 150 Star 1,451 Fork 615 systemd/systemd Code Issues 484 Pull requests 32 Projects You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. How good should one be to participate in PS? his comment is here How to handle a common misconception when writing a Master's thesis?
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. That's simple solution to make everyone happy ;-) martinpitt commented Oct 9, 2015 (I vote for): print warning and unlink() + symlink() to fix the problem automatically during systemd startup That's Please in general use symbolic links instead of HARD links. I am not sure I understand why Ubuntu still runs into issues with this all... /etc/mtab is dead since 4+ years, and there are still up-to-date Ubuntu systems around with it
Didn't wait for it to finish, but just removed the file manually. Thanx everyone. Sounds good, thanks! At the very least there should be a rescue shell, so that you have the chance to clean up.
Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign up using Facebook Sign up using Email and Password Post as a guest Name