Sample text from SQL Server error 948 The cryptic version numbers in the error message refer to the internal database version. These internal version numbers are undocumented but are (at least currently) There could be versioning issues here - example, try to restore a backup from SQL 2008 Ent (tested so you know it is not corrupt) to an x86 SQLExpress version. posted @ Sunday, July 17, 2011 3:25 PM Print Comments on this entry: #re: Internal SQL Server Database Version Numbers Left by Chirag Shah at 7/19/2011 7:53 PM Dan, This Vent kitchen hood vent to roof turbine vent? http://rinfix.com/sql-server/version-539-and-cannot-restore-or.html
You cannot post events. The server supports version 539 and cannot restore or upgrade this database. It is highly unlikely that you will have to re-create the database, we just need to find out more specific details about this database before we can tell you what the Database Maintenance, Troubleshooting, Repair, and Conversion Answer ID 24758 Related Information: If desired, after your database or databases have been updated, you can uninstall Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 and
Pro to Microsoft SQL Server 2008? Is it a beta release or something? You cannot open a database that is incompatible with this version of sqlservr.exe. Sql Server Versions You cannot edit your own events.
You cannot open a database that is incompatible with this version of sqlservr.exe. The Database Cannot Be Opened Because It Is Version 661 This Server Supports Version 655 And Earlier not particulary using new features from SQL/Server 2005, so its pretty inconvenient not knowing how to do this, and for mixed client environments where some databases are 2005, others 2000, its We are still operating with our SQL 2008 R2 for production, but development process is underway on 2012. SQL Server 2008 to SQL Server 2005 Server: Msg 3241, Level 16, State 7, Line 1 The media family on device 'f:\temp\test001_sql2008.bak' is incorrectly formed.
We only need 2000 to migrate our data to a new version of the software we are using. My overall question is, do we have to re-create the database to use 2012 or is there a work around? Find a mistake in the following bogus proof Teenage daughter refusing to go to school Why does top 50% need a -50% translate offset? Monday, January 15, 2007 4:18 PM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote hi there i'm facing the same problem... 1] I had SQL 2000 database dbTest... 2] attached that
Please use the previous link instead. asked 3 years ago viewed 17265 times active 2 years ago Related 15Restoring a backup to an older version of SQL Server1upgrading sql server 2000 database to sql server 201210Upgrade SQL Cannot Open Database Version 539. Upgrade The Database To The Latest Version Start a coup online without the government intervening Safety - Improve braking power in wet conditions Are keywords in resolv.conf case sensitive? Sql Server 2008 R2 ERROR MESSAGE #4 Server: Msg 3241, Level 16, State 7, Line 1 The media family on device [path of backup] is incorrectly formed.
CREATE DATABASE is aborted. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 950) sql-server sql-server-2008 sql-server-2012 share|improve this question edited Mar 1 '13 at 19:56 asked Mar 1 '13 at 17:55 Andreu 57116 2 SQL Server 2008 to SQL Server 2000 Server: Msg 3169, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 The backed-up database has on-disk structure version 655. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the Swiftpage, ACT!, and the Swiftpage product and service names mentioned herein are registered trademarks or trademarks of Swiftpage ACT! Sql Server 2008 R2 Download
SQL Server cannot process this media family. Then export DB from SQL2005 to SQL2000. You cannot edit your own posts. Why do some banks have more than one routing number in the US?
Pro, Act! Can you expand your answer, please? –Michael Green Sep 16 '14 at 11:03 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using Run DBCC CHECKTABLE on sysindexes. We tried to attach our database back to SQL 2000, but this error occured.
If I had used a new feature in 2005 then fair enough, but I would not be wanting to export back to 2000 in this circumstance. Monday, April 16, 2007 I think you should export all application tables in SQL Server 2000 and import them in SQL Server 2000. I mean, this table is quite a big database; and the time it would take to re-create with all the inserts would be unreal. I am not sure if Microsoft has announced backward compability of SQL 2005 Db's or supplied a detailed "How to" instruction or not; but they should have "SHOUT IT OUT LOUD"
Server: Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1 RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally. I would much rather believe the database version field is actually corrupted in the file (eg. If you have enough space on the 2008 R2 server for another copy of the db, get one on there, then try setting the compatability level to 100 (2008 R2), then Comments have been closed on this topic. «November» SunMonTueWedThuFriSat303112345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293012345678910 About Contact Login Archives December, 2014 (1) May, 2012 (1) September, 2011 (1) August, 2011 (1) July, 2011 (2) April, 2011 (1)
and now.. The version used for the backup can be obtained by running:restore headeronly from disk = 'E:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\Backup\Hills.bak' SQL = Scarcely Qualifies as a Language Post #536185 sumanthchowdary.ksumanthchowdary.k Posted Thursday, You cannot post EmotIcons. errrrrr..
Calculating ...5(5+4(4+3(3+2(2+1(1))))) C# TBB updating metadata value Why does Cutie act like this and lesser robots listen to it? CREATE DATABASE is aborted. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 950) .................. Afterwards backup your database in SQL2000. CREATE DATABASE is aborted.
Monday, June 16, 2008 12:24 PM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote You cannot restore/attach a database from Sql 2005 to Sql 2000, however you can move your datas have another Dr. Will I get the same result if I use 18-55mm lens at 55mm (full zoom) and 55-200mm lens at 55mm (no zoom), if not, then why?