Monday, July 19, 2010 8:09 AM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote I prefer to use COLLATE DATABASE_DEFAULT. Will I get the same result if I use 18-55mm lens at 55mm (full zoom) and 55-200mm lens at 55mm (no zoom), if not, then why? statement is like this Select City COLLATE DATABASE_DEFAULT AS Place, State, Country FROM DEPT1 UNION ALL Select '' AS Place, 'Arizona' As State, Country FROM DEPT2 but If If do this Problem with function inside brackets. Check This Out
Kalman Toth, SQL Server & Business Intelligence Training; SQL 2008 GRAND SLAM Yup... UPDATE: The new error you are getting after adding the COLLATE clause to the 2nd query in the UNION ALL is due to adding the COLLATE clause to too many of why is it enforcing to use this ... See more: SQL SQL-Server Hello everyone, i have to perform a join between two tables which are on different databases. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3861782/sql-server-error-implicit-conversion-of-because-the-collation-of-the-value-is-u
Edited by - trouble2 on 06/30/2006 10:32:00 nr SQLTeam MVY United Kingdom 12543 Posts Posted-06/30/2006: 10:34:46 It means that you are comparing or setting a varchar value with The code should have something like varchar(255) or whatever your desired length is. –Gordon Linoff Feb 6 '14 at 15:57 Why don't you remove your Convert()s one at a Winners Winners & Prizes Ads Social YouTube/DNFVideo Facebook/DotNetFunda Twitter/DotNetFunda LinkedIn/In/DotNetFunda Plus.Google.Com Like us on Facebook Top Forums Authors Thu, 10-Nov-2016 Authors 101010 All Time Authors 525034553290 Latest members | More ... asked 6 years ago viewed 42978 times active 5 years ago Upcoming Events 2016 Community Moderator Election ends Nov 22 Linked 0 Error Implicit conversion of varchar value to varchar 0
SELECT u.UnsubscribeID COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS, u.EmailAddress COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS, u.SentEmailFK COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS but it still gives me error. Collate Sql Server When working on the development machine everything was working fine until i deployed my database on the clients server. Added exact query SELECT * FROM OPENQUERY([SERVERA], 'SELECT ''SERVERA'',resourcephone.[PhoneNum] ,resourcephone.[PhoneExt] ,COUNT(2) as CNT FROM [rtc].[dbo].[ResourcePhone] WHERE PhoneNum like ''+44%'' OR PhoneNum like ''+41%'' GROUP BY PhoneNum, PhoneExt HAVING COUNT(2) > 1;') Was it legal to rant against trick or treating via loudspeaker during halloween?
Mar 04, 2013 01:33 AM|NiravVyas|LINK HI, Are you doing any insert, update , uninon or some other operation? Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Expression Type Int Is Invalid For Collate Clause Sql Server 2008 Come on over! Sql Server Collate Database_default Why dd takes too long?
US Election results 2016: What went wrong with prediction models? his comment is here The difference is SERVERA has a collation of SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS and SERVERB has a collation of Latin1_General_CI_AS. If they are equal then the problem you have is that the columns have different collation. SQL Server Forums Profile | ActiveTopics | Members | Search | ForumFAQ Register Now and get your question answered! Union All Collation Conflict
How is Anti Aliasing Implemented in Ray Tracing? Why does top 50% need a -50% translate offset? select name , collation_name from sys.databases where name = 'master' or you can find it by right click on DB name and Properties window then you can change the collation of this contact form Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Implicit conversion of varchar value to varchar - collation conflict up vote 4 down vote favorite 2 I'm getting the following error
How to handle swear words in quote / transcription? Change Collation Sql Server I have tried adding COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS to the column names but this has not worked. Check this answer, it answer a very similar question It is better to stick to a single collation globally.
THanks Hope this helps Thanks Nirav ‹ Previous Thread|Next Thread › This site is managed for Microsoft by Neudesic, LLC. | © 2016 Microsoft. Doing that one extra step put the fields that were already in agreement into conflict. This IS the above solution. navigate here Not the answer you're looking for?
I'm editing my answert to add another snippet to check all your columns collation at once. –Yaroslav Aug 23 '12 at 9:22 | show 3 more comments up vote 1 down Boss sends a birthday message. Can you dispel a magic effect you can't perceive? Understand that English isn't everyone's first language so be lenient of bad spelling and grammar.
the resourcephone.[PhoneExt] field) is unnecessary and is over-complicating the query. MathSciNet review alert?