Home > Not Complete > Thread 1 Cannot Allocate New Log Sequence Oracle 10g

Thread 1 Cannot Allocate New Log Sequence Oracle 10g


Typically there are 2 scenarios where I have seen this. Range of value in Oracle 10g- 1 to 20 but in Oracle 11g - 1 to 36. December 09, 2003 - 7:16 am UTC Reviewer: Duncan from UK Tom I ran an update during the day which took 5hrs 45 mins to complete. I had several "cannot allocate new log" and a couple of "checkpoint not complete"s. http://rinfix.com/not-complete/thread-1-cannot-allocate-new-log-sequence-oracle-11g.html

Or does the redo generation come and go and come and go and come and go I'm leaning towards "it comes and goes and comes and goes" (and if you are SSDs are also not good for sequential writes (also a couple of other reasons) and redo logs should not be placed on these (unless you are using some appliance and it Asked: May 02, 2000 - 1:20 pm UTC Answered by: Tom Kyte � Last updated: October 16, 2012 - 9:29 am UTC Category: � Version: Whilst you are here, check out Covered by US Patent. https://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:69012348056

Thread 1 Cannot Allocate New Log Sequence Private Strand Flush Not Complete

If you have fewer redo groups then adding more redo groups will help. Great response April 10, 2006 - 2:49 pm UTC Reviewer: Nish Garg from TX USA Thanks for your response. I'm talking things like: * Dropping columns * Shrinking allocated space * Removing chained blocks and restoring the PCTFREE * Re-or… Oracle Database Duplicating a Database Using Oracle RMAN Video by: Not sure if any are related since I had the same things without an uncommitted transactions pending.

Connect with top rated Experts 19 Experts available now in Live! When no user connect to, database runs on 8i (no OPS) genarates only 1 archivelog file when database startup. It can make it so that you get through bursts of activity without encountering the checkpoint not complete message. Private Strand Flush Not Complete 11gr2 I have implemented many business critical systems for fortune 500, 1000 companies.

I was thinking the "Beginning checkpoint..." applied to the log number on the next line in the alert log. Weirder things have happened..... 0 LVL 22 Overall: Level 22 Oracle Database 14 Message Active 2 days ago Author Comment by:Steve Wales2014-01-31 Comment Utility Permalink(# a39825336) Forgot to mention in I analyse archivelog files and select from v$logmnr_contents: SQLWKS> SELECT operation,count(*) FROM v$logmnr_contents group by operation 2> OPERATION COUNT(*) -------------------------------- ---------- COMMIT 8696 DELETE 5 INSERT 5 INTERNAL 17903 START 8697 http://www.dba-oracle.com/t_thread_cannot_allocate_new_log_sequence.htm As I say, I'd like one or more log switch per day.

Home | Invite Peers | More Oracle Groups Your account is ready. Thread 1 Cannot Allocate New Log 11gr2 What I was refering the *only* benifit of sequential writing by the LGWR. You can disregard these messages. July 27, 2004 - 4:29 am UTC Reviewer: Marvin Hi I see checkpoint not complete msg in my alert: Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 637 Current log# 8 seq# 637

Checkpoint Not Complete Oracle 11g

and we said... great post to read Or are they permanently saved on disk? Thread 1 Cannot Allocate New Log Sequence Private Strand Flush Not Complete What would you be wanting to measure by "fullness" Bekka April 12, 2005 - 7:37 am UTC Reviewer: Invisible from UK I'd just like it so that at least 1 log Increase Size Of Redo Logs Tom has now begun a much earned retirement.

So there's nothing we can do to speed up ARCH (other than faster disks I guess) - correct? navigate here The data has already been flushed to disk (the individual data blocks) by the DBWR. I normally start at 50/60m or thereabouts). In the near term we are going to try reducing the size of the logs (256MB) and maybe shorten the checkpoint interval... Checkpoint Not Complete In Oracle 11g Alert Log

Identify the current size of the redo log members from v$log. we can write 228 bytes sequentially to the log files -- instead of writing 32k of data out using random IO (lots of seeking around) the checkpoint writes out all of MOSC note 435780.1 has tips on avoiding the checkpoint not complete error: Oracle Training from Don Burleson The best on site "Oracle training classes" are just a phone call http://rinfix.com/not-complete/thread-cannot-allocate-new-log-sequence-oracle.html tons of stuff -- queues, jobs running in the background with dbms_job, smon - they all can generate redo...

So why the big “delay” now to just update file headers? Checkpoint Not Complete Oracle 11g Sap If the number of DB writer processes is greater than or equal to the number of processor groups, then there is no adjustment. Join our community for more solutions or to ask questions.

Anyone considering using the services of an Oracle support expert should independently investigate their credentials and experience, and not rely on advertisements and self-proclaimed expertise.

  • I realize that it is proportional to number of datafiles, io/disk speed.
  • Just the datafile headers and controlfiles get updated with the new SCN.
  • that way, we can complete the checkpoint while you are not busy.

Get 1:1 Help Now Advertise Here Enjoyed your answer? No waiting. d) maybe caused a split up an index -- say 2 more blocks. Oracle Add Redo Log Group Previously when I want to take backup of single user(user= rjtm) it will be finished 100% successfully without error and warning in 7 min using expdp/exp=12min.

Share Your Story Question and Answer Thanks for the question, William . My "2 cents" contribution to the Oracle community. The number of strands depends on the cpu_count. this contact form Once I've discovered that certain messages don't mean anything, I exclude them (like the one about private strand flush not complete or whatever it is - the developers on MOS say

Am i doing something wrong in this? PRTG is easy to set up & use. this occurrs when Oracle attempts to reuse a log file but the checkpoint that would flush the blocks that may have redo in this log file has not yet completed -- I see # of checkpoint buffers written - but not # of blocks written to the datafiles.

dbwr flushes blocks because we ran out of them (cache is full) or lgwr signals a checkpoint on the log switch (not just when it switches all of the way around) This deletion, I would imagine, generates a pretty big redo spike. (After all, until the transaction commits, we might want to UNDO all that deletion...) Anyway, I too am getting the